Replace the lab · Keep the margin

  • $90–$120+typical variable savings per pair vs many outsourced lab invoices
  • 70–90% marginscommonly cited on cash-pair orthotics when you keep the lab margin
  • Same-daydevices in-clinic vs 2–4 week lab turnaround—when printer + staffing fit

Orthotics are not a cost center—they are a high-margin clinical service when you own design + production. Numbers vary by payer mix and shop cost—use our calculators to stress-test yours.

Fit360 alternative

Fit360 Alternative: ArchSpline for Podiatrists Who Want Clinical Control, Not Black-Box Algorithms

Fit360 processes 1M+ scans per year using “advanced algorithms” to create personalized insoles.

The question for podiatrists: Do you want an algorithm making clinical decisions, or do you want protocols that translate your exam into specific mechanical features?

ArchSpline was built by a practicing DPM because algorithms can’t replace clinical reasoning. Here’s how we compare to Fit360.

ArchSpline vs Fit360: Side-by-Side

Design philosophy

ArchSpline

Protocol-driven: Your exam findings → built-in design logic → specific orthotic features. Transparent, reproducible, billable

Fit360

Algorithm-driven: 3D scan → proprietary algorithm → personalized shape. Black box

Clinical control

ArchSpline

You see why the medial flange is 12mm: PTTD Stage II protocol

Fit360

Algorithm decides. You adjust the output

Built by

ArchSpline

Practicing DPM with 15+ years clinical + manufacturing

Fit360

Software company

Billing & reimbursement

ArchSpline

HCPCS L3000 mapping, auto-doc, denial prevention built in

Fit360

Not advertised. Requires separate billing software

Scanner required

ArchSpline

Scanner-agnostic. Use any device — including free iPhone scanners that send files directly into ArchSpline to create the patient file

Fit360

Accepts scans. No mobile app advertised

CAD required

ArchSpline

Zero CAD skill needed. Protocols do the work. Web-native CAD available for edge cases

Fit360

Requires design skill or lab outsourcing

Pricing

ArchSpline

$229/mo for 20 cases. $449/mo for 60. $899/mo for 200. +$3–10/case

Fit360

Not public. Labs report $500–$1500/mo typical

Production

ArchSpline

Flexible: Print in-house or use Production Marketplace. No printer required

Fit360

Printer-agnostic. You manage production

Beta program

ArchSpline

Founding Beta Partner tier: 5 designs/month + locked-in early adopter pricing

Fit360

Contact for demo

Typical savings

ArchSpline

$90–$120+ per pair vs lab invoices. Cash orthotics bill $300–$500

Fit360

Not published. Varies by your production setup

Choose Fit360 if you want…

  • Algorithm-driven design and you’re comfortable letting software decide geometry
  • High-volume lab workflow and have staff trained on CAD adjustments
  • 1M+ scan ecosystem for benchmarking, if that data access is valuable to you

Fit360 is proven in labs processing hundreds of pairs per month.

Choose ArchSpline if you want…

  • Protocol transparency: See exactly how your clinical inputs — diagnosis, RCSP, NCSP, forefoot-to-rearfoot — map to posting, skive, and flange geometry
  • Practice economics: Not just a shape. You get the shape + HCPCS L3000 billing automation + denial prevention. Algorithms don’t do billing
  • Zero CAD barrier: Protocols handle 90% of cases. Web-native CAD is there for the other 10%. No software to install, no training required
  • Scanner flexibility: Use the free iPhone LiDAR scanner, iPad Structure Sensor, foam box, or pro scanners. Scans create patient files directly in ArchSpline
  • DPM-built: Built by a podiatrist because orthotics are a clinical service, not just a manufactured product

The “Black Box” Problem with Algorithms

Fit360’s algorithm gives you a personalized shape. But when Medicare audits you, can you defend why the heel cup is 14mm deep?

With ArchSpline, you can: “Patient presented with PTTD Stage II, RCSP 6° valgus, NCSP 2° valgus. Protocol 4B applies: 4° intrinsic rearfoot post, 12mm medial flange, 2mm Kirby skive. Here’s the documentation.”

Algorithms optimize for shape. Protocols optimize for defensible clinical care + reimbursement.

Real ROI: Algorithms Don’t Pay Your Bills

Software

Fit360
$500–$1500/mo reported
ArchSpline
$229/mo for 20 cases

Billing software

Fit360
Separate purchase required
ArchSpline
Included: HCPCS L3000 automation

CAD training

Fit360
Required for adjustments
ArchSpline
Not required. Protocols do it

Denial prevention

Fit360
Manual
ArchSpline
Automated checklists

Per-pair savings

Fit360
Depends on your production
ArchSpline
$90–$120+ typical vs lab

Break-even on ArchSpline Starter: ~2 cases/month vs lab fees. Most clinics hit that in week 1. Calculate your ROI.

Scanner Agnostic: Use What You Have

Fit360 accepts scans. ArchSpline accepts scans from:

  • Free iPhone LiDAR — scan uploads directly to patient file in ArchSpline
  • iPad Structure Sensor
  • Professional scanners: 3D Scanner HD, Everscan, etc.
  • Foam box + desktop scanner

Use any phone-based scan workflow with protocol-driven design + billing support in one platform.

Try protocol-driven design free

Founding Beta Clinic Program includes 5 designs/month, guided biomechanical workflows, structured revision workflows, research-informed starting templates, educational onboarding resources, direct beta feedback access, and locked-in early adopter pricing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ArchSpline more accurate than Fit360’s algorithms?
Accuracy depends on inputs. Fit360’s algorithm optimizes for shape from scan. ArchSpline’s protocols optimize for mechanical function from clinical exam + scan. For medically necessary orthotics billed to insurance, protocols provide defensible documentation. For comfort insoles, both work.
Do I need CAD skills like with Fit360?
No. Fit360 requires design adjustments to algorithm output. ArchSpline requires zero CAD skill — protocols generate the geometry. Web-native CAD is available for edge cases but not required.
Can I use my iPhone to scan with ArchSpline?
Yes. Use any free LiDAR scanner app. STL/OBJ files upload directly to ArchSpline and create the patient file automatically, so you can keep mobile scanning flexible without hardware lock-in.
How is billing better than Fit360?
Fit360 outputs a shape. ArchSpline outputs a shape + HCPCS L3000 code + auto-generated documentation + denial prevention checklist. Algorithms don’t do billing. Protocols do.

Implementation reality: algorithm output vs protocol accountability

Clinics evaluating Fit360 alternatives usually ask the same question: who is accountable for geometry decisions at chart review time? Algorithm-driven systems can generate a shape quickly, but the clinical team still has to explain why that shape was chosen for this diagnosis, this exam, and this treatment plan. That gap becomes visible during audits, payer disputes, and difficult follow-up visits.

Protocol-driven design changes that conversation. The orthotic is not only a mesh output; it is a documented chain from findings to features, with revision history that can be reviewed by clinicians, billers, and operations staff. This is especially important for multi-provider clinics that need consistent prescribing logic across locations, not just fast rendering.

In practice, many teams adopt ArchSpline by starting with cases where documentation quality matters most, then expanding as confidence grows. That phased approach preserves throughput while improving consistency, reimbursement defensibility, and communication between clinical and fabrication teams.